These two chapters in the textbook A
World of Fine ART discuss the
basic terms which would be art critics use to communicate intelligently, among
one another, about the works of art they encounter. The ability to concisely
describe what one sees in a work of art is crucial to conveying the feeling and
underlying meaning the viewer perceives, when in the presence of fine art.
A few of the definitions taken from the textbook are listed
here to assist the reader in their interpretation of the forth coming concepts
described in this article. Here is a partial list of art terms:
abstract - when
the work does not resemble an object as the eye sees it in the real world
realism - when a work closely resembles what the eye sees in the real world
content - what the work means beyond its subject matter
ethnocentric - characterized by the attitude that your group or culture is superior
form - overall structure of the work
iconography - iconic symbols connected and recognized by specific cultural groups
naturalistic - not truly the realistic version of an object, but an artist’s comingling of natural scenes
nonobjective - when the work doesn’t refer to a natural object at all
nonrepresentational - when the work doesn’t represent the natural world in any way
representational - portrayal of natural objects in recognizable form
subject matter - what is literally depicted
realism - when a work closely resembles what the eye sees in the real world
content - what the work means beyond its subject matter
ethnocentric - characterized by the attitude that your group or culture is superior
form - overall structure of the work
iconography - iconic symbols connected and recognized by specific cultural groups
naturalistic - not truly the realistic version of an object, but an artist’s comingling of natural scenes
nonobjective - when the work doesn’t refer to a natural object at all
nonrepresentational - when the work doesn’t represent the natural world in any way
representational - portrayal of natural objects in recognizable form
subject matter - what is literally depicted
Form vs. Content
Form, the actual subject of the work, and content, the
meaning the artist is portraying, is not always readily apparent in some works
of fine art. This representational piece by Toyo Sesshu circa.1500 is a
mountain top scene in which both elements are easily distinguishable. The form
is somewhat abstract, and there is not much realism in the rendition. But, the
subject matter is easily distinguishable as a landscape of a mountain top, as the
title suggests. The intent of the artist is apparent as well, to simply depict
a landscape of a mountain top. The form and content of the following pieces
will be discussed for their specific representational formats as related to the
concepts they imbue.
Landscape (detail showing mountain tops)
by Toyo Sesshu circa.1500
ink on paper, 77.2 x 27 cm
from Seattle Art Museum
by Toyo Sesshu circa.1500
ink on paper, 77.2 x 27 cm
from Seattle Art Museum
Representational Art
At first glance, it is evident that the subject matter of
this work of art, by Albert Bierstadt (1830-1902), is the likeness of a butterfly,
an object commonly found in nature. The representation conveys a sense of
realism in form, but does not portray the natural surroundings in which the
subject could be found. Even though, this is a beautiful example of a representational
portrait of a butterfly.
Butterfly
by Albert Bierstadt (1830-1902)
oil pencil on paper
from the University of California, San Diego
by Albert Bierstadt (1830-1902)
oil pencil on paper
from the University of California, San Diego
Abstract Art
This is a work of art that depicts war as envisioned by
Jackson Pollock (1912-1965). It displays an example of abstract art, as do many
of his pieces. Upon close inspection, one can distinguish a few signs of representational
elements, but they are displayed in abstraction. Looking at the obscure
likeness of a human a top of the chaotic pile of rubble, it can be seen that
the form melds into, what appears to be, the likeness of a cow. All in all,
there is truly no distinguishable sense of realism to the subject matter which
makes it a good example of abstract artwork.
War
by Jackson Pollock (1912-1965)
Pen and Ink, and colored pencils on paper 20.675” x 26”
from The Metropolitan Museum of Art
© 2007 Pollock-Kransner Foundation
by Jackson Pollock (1912-1965)
Pen and Ink, and colored pencils on paper 20.675” x 26”
from The Metropolitan Museum of Art
© 2007 Pollock-Kransner Foundation
Non-Objective art
Nonrepresentational art is specifically about form. The form
of this painting, by Kisimir Malevitch (1878-1935), is simply of a triangle and
a square. The subject matter does not represent anything in the natural world,
nor does it insist any specific meaning. The art object is simply a composition
of the colors and materials used in creating it, and this piece is a very nice
example of non-objective artwork.
Suprematism
by Kisimir Malevitch (1878-1935)
watercolor 11.5” x 8.5”
from Los Angeles County Museum of Art (SUNY Binghamton Digital Image Collection)
by Kisimir Malevitch (1878-1935)
watercolor 11.5” x 8.5”
from Los Angeles County Museum of Art (SUNY Binghamton Digital Image Collection)
Iconic Art
Jean Michel Basquiat (1960-1988) is said to be an artist whose
work is “literally packed with a private, highly ambiguous iconography (37,
Sayre)” as seen in this large painting entitled Felix the Cat. The cartoon cat Felix is most evident, but there is
also iconic significance in the portrayal of the dark skinned woman, the
African ceremonial mask and the blue bow tie. The iconic symbols here may only be
readily recognizable to people of a specific time period or of a specific
cultural background. But, the icons are visually apparent none the less.
Felix the Cat
by Jean-Michel Basquiat (1960-1988)
Acrylic on Canvas 9’8” x 13’
from SUNY Binghamton Digital Image Collection
by Jean-Michel Basquiat (1960-1988)
Acrylic on Canvas 9’8” x 13’
from SUNY Binghamton Digital Image Collection
Example of Iconoclasm
One of the most popularly notable examples of iconoclasm is
the toppling of Saddam Hussein’s statue on April 9, 2003, just outside of
Baghdad. The destruction of the iconic statue represented the end in a reign of
tyranny at the hands of Hussein.
The first abstract work by Zane Lewis entitled Watch me Slowly Death is a subtle portrayal of iconoclastic artwork. It is highly abstract, but does resemble a traditional
bust portrait. Looking closely at the portrait, one can distinguish the subtle
icons of a world famous perfume littering the form. The content suggests death due
to the use of this product, and is evident in the title and the dark void in
the face of the subject.
This second piece, also by Zane Lewis, is a more outspoken version of iconoclasm. It uses the distinguishable likeness of the Pope, an iconic symbol to the entire Christian world, spewing colored paint from the mouth to represent the hypocrisy of the Catholic Church. The colored paint spewing from the pope’s mouth introduces a destructive inference to the well redound likeness of the pope. The jading of the iconic symbol is the very nature of iconoclasm. It is very ironic that the exhibit was first displayed in Bologna, Italy, a mecca of the Roman Catholic Church.
This second piece, also by Zane Lewis, is a more outspoken version of iconoclasm. It uses the distinguishable likeness of the Pope, an iconic symbol to the entire Christian world, spewing colored paint from the mouth to represent the hypocrisy of the Catholic Church. The colored paint spewing from the pope’s mouth introduces a destructive inference to the well redound likeness of the pope. The jading of the iconic symbol is the very nature of iconoclasm. It is very ironic that the exhibit was first displayed in Bologna, Italy, a mecca of the Roman Catholic Church.
Watch me Slowly Death, 2009
by Zane Lewis
paint and paper on Plexiglas 51” x 51” x 3”
by Zane Lewis
paint and paper on Plexiglas 51” x 51” x 3”
Untitled
installation Arte Fiera in Bologna, Italy (2007)
installation Arte Fiera in Bologna, Italy (2007)
No comments:
Post a Comment